A full article is printed on page 25 of
this month's Bar Business Magazine, my article entitled "Time & Money,
Is a Wage & Hour Class Action Secretly on Your Menu" is featured in
the How To Section.
Friday, January 23, 2015
Tuesday, January 13, 2015
Congress Introduces Bill to Lower Tax Burden on Craft Brewers
A bill was recently introduced in Congress that would substantially reduce the tax burden on small and craft brewers that produce less than 6 million barrels of beer in a calendar year. Currently, the TTB taxes all barrels at the rate of $18/barrel. The proposed amendment would lower the tax to $3.50 for the first 60,000 qualified barrels, and then to $16 for 1,940,000 barrels. The first 2 million barrels would be taxed at the substantially reduced rate. The bill was introduced by bipartisan members of Congress who admitted that the federal excise taxes are outdated and put a substantial burden on small brewers. The hope is that the tax relief will help the continued expansion of the craft brewery boom and help the small businesses add jobs and grow.
The text of the proposed bill can be found here: http://paulsen.house.gov/uploads/Small%20BREW%20ACT3.pdf
The text of the proposed bill can be found here: http://paulsen.house.gov/uploads/Small%20BREW%20ACT3.pdf
Tuesday, December 30, 2014
Qui Tam - Illinois' New Form of Ambulance Chasers Targeting the Wine Industry
An Illinois Plaintiff's lawyer has
recently been targeting the wine industry in qui tam class action suits
alleging that wineries with direct ship sales have been breaking the law by
deliberately disregarding the Illinois tax code. The Illinois False Claims Act
(IFCA), formerly known as the Whistleblower Reward and Protection Act, derives
from the Federal False Claims Act. 740 ILCS 175/1, A provision allows a private
citizen to bring a civil suit on behalf of the government in the name of the
government to recover damages for the government.
The Plaintiff in this case is the lawyer himself, Stephen Diamond
of Chicago. Diamond is suing on his own - claiming he made the purchases and
discovered the act - and thus not sharing in any recovery. Diamond has filed
over 300 suits against out of state retailers.
Some of those claim that Illinois wine retailers are defrauding the
Illinois government because they do not charge tax on the shipping and handling
portion of the sales. The Illinois Department of Revenue has addressed the
shipping charges, and does not require shipping charges if the shipping charges
are separate from the price of goods or if the shipping charges are equal to
the cost to the retailer of using the common carrier. Ill. Dept. Rev. Reg.
Title 86 Part 130 Section 130.415. The shipping charges are taxable if the
shipping charges exceed the cost to the retailer of using the common carrier,
or if the shipping charges are included in the price.
So if the Code is pretty clear, how does the Plaintiff have
a leg to stand on? The Illinois Supreme Court held in Kean v. Wal-Mart Stores,
Inc., 235 Ill. 2d 351, (Illinois 2009) that the tax on shipping charges
was part of the “selling price” according to 35 ILCS 105/3-10 (2006), and 35
ILCS 120/1 (2006). The Court concluded
that because internet purchases must be delivered, that shipping was an inseparable
part of the transaction. The court held that “under the Retailers Occupation
Tax Act, that the shipping charge is inseparable of the Internet “selling
price,” and tax must be assessed on the shipping charge.
While there are defenses, the litigation has been costly to
those affected. Because Diamond is filing on his own behalf, he is actually
making purchases himself. Most of the
cases have settled on terms favorable to Diamond as opposed to litigating the
defenses. The Illinois Attorney General
has not yet gotten involved to make a determination, and the legislature has
not yet addressed the disparity in the tax code and the Supreme Court
ruling. Until then, if you're a direct
to consumer seller, it is advisable to beware and take precautions to avoid
being a target of the suit.
The Clark Hill Food and Beverage Team is well-equipped to
help if you have questions about these actions, or how to avoid these actions.
Please contact Jonathan Boulahanis, jboulahanis@clarkhill.com if you have
questions.
Thursday, December 18, 2014
Chicago Bars Face De Ja Vu This New Year's As Crackdown on Happy Hour Violations Continue
The City of Chicago Department of Business Affairs and Consumer Protection has investigators racketing up to enforce the Illinois Happy Hour Law of 1989 again this New Year's Eve. Last year, the City cited over 80 establishments for violations of the Happy Hour Law by promoting open bar packages. The Happy Hour Law only allows an open bar during a set period of time for a private event like a wedding or private fundraiser. It came as a surprise to many of the establishments, as the State of Illinois Liquor Control Commission previously had been the exclusive regulatory authority for all intents and purposes until that point. The establishments faced fines from the City in the range of $5,000, and included threats to revoke their liquor license for repeat offenders. It is expected that the City will again cite establishments, and that the City has already started investigating establishments that are advertising such packages on social media.
If your bar or restaurant has questions about your event, or compliance with the Illinois Happy Hour Law, Clark Hill's Food and Beverage Team is ready to assist. Contact Jonathan Boulahanis at jboulahanis@clarkhill.com
http://chicago.eater.com/2014/12/17/7410623/new-years-eve-chicago-liquor-crackdown-open-bar
http://www.cityofchicago.org/city/en/depts/bacp/supp_info/top_tips_for_liquorlicensees.html
If your bar or restaurant has questions about your event, or compliance with the Illinois Happy Hour Law, Clark Hill's Food and Beverage Team is ready to assist. Contact Jonathan Boulahanis at jboulahanis@clarkhill.com
http://chicago.eater.com/2014/12/17/7410623/new-years-eve-chicago-liquor-crackdown-open-bar
http://www.cityofchicago.org/city/en/depts/bacp/supp_info/top_tips_for_liquorlicensees.html
Friday, December 12, 2014
Quote from San Diego Union Tribune Article Re: "Handmade" Label Suits
Attorney Jonathan Boulahanis, co-leader of the food and beverage team with the law firm Clark Hill PLC, who is not involved in any of these cases, agrees.
Buzzwords like “small batch” and “handmade” are starting to get challenged in consumer fraud cases more frequently, he said.
He said the underlying idea of the lawsuits has some novelty to it, in that consumers are paying attention to those catchwords in deciding what to buy.
Whether the suits have merit is a different question, he said.
The full article can be viewed here:
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/dec/11/lawsuits-handmade-liquor-label-makers-mark-tito/?#article-copy
Buzzwords like “small batch” and “handmade” are starting to get challenged in consumer fraud cases more frequently, he said.
He said the underlying idea of the lawsuits has some novelty to it, in that consumers are paying attention to those catchwords in deciding what to buy.
Whether the suits have merit is a different question, he said.
The full article can be viewed here:
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/dec/11/lawsuits-handmade-liquor-label-makers-mark-tito/?#article-copy
Thursday, December 4, 2014
Chicago Panera Decides Not to Renew Lease in Part Because of Wage Hike
A Panera Bread Co. in the Chicago neighborhood of Beverly has advised that it will not renew its lease in Chicago after the City passed an Ordinance increasing the minimum wage in the City limits. Panera is about 100 feet from nearby suburb Evergreen Park. The Illinois Restaurant Association, and several of its members, made emotional appeals to the City Council that warned of these ramifications and lobbied for a reasonable, statewide increase. It will be interesting to see how many other establishments bordering a suburb will look to relocate in the coming years.
http://www.dnainfo.com/chicago/20141204/beverly/beverly-panera-bread-closing-alderman-says-minimum-wage-hike-played-role
http://www.dnainfo.com/chicago/20141204/beverly/beverly-panera-bread-closing-alderman-says-minimum-wage-hike-played-role
Tuesday, December 2, 2014
City of Chicago Approves $13 Minimum Wage Phased In By 2019
After much debate, and strong opinions on both sides, the
Chicago City Council approved a minimum wage hike to be phased in over the next
five years. The City Council voted 44-5 today approving an increase to
$13 per hour minimum wage by July 2019.
Some key provisions of the new ordinance include:
- Increases in the minimum wage to $10.00 an hour in July
2015. Minimum wage is currently set at $8.25 per hour.
- Future increases of the minimum wage to $10.50 in July
2016, $11.00 in July 2017, $12.00 in July 2018, and $13.00 in July 2019.
- After July 2019, annual increases will take place based on
the Consumer Price Index and capped at a 2.5% increase per year.
- Employers utilizing the tip credit will also see a hike in
minimum wage. Starting in July 2015, those employers will be permitted to
utilize the tip credit allowed for in the Illinois Minimum Wage Law, but will
need to add $0.50 per hour. In July 2016, tipped employees will be paid
according to the tip credit allowed in the Illinois Minimum Wage Law, but will
need to add $1.00 per hour. Starting in July 2017, and every July
thereafter, tipped employees will be paid the amount from 2016 plus an increase
tied to the Consumer Price Index and capped at 2.5% per year.
- If the federal government or Illinois passes a minimum
wage increase above the City’s minimum wage at any time, the federal or state
minimum wage will supersede the City’s.
- The City will require an additional poster regarding the
City’s Minimum Wage to be posted in a conspicuous place.
- The City has authorized the Department of Business Affairs
and Consumer Protection to enforce City violations, and violations range from
$500-$1,000 per employee, per day.
- The Ordinance also allows for private suits by the
employee to recover damages up to three times the amount of any underpayment,
plus attorneys’ fees and costs.
Proponents of the Ordinance touted the increase as a way to
lift thousands of families above the poverty line, and increase spending power
in communities. They also lamented the fact that no action had been
taken in Springfield or Washington, and action needed to be taken now. The
Raise Chicago Coalition called the Ordinance a major victory and celebrated the
profound impact the raise will have on minimum wage workers. The State of
Illinois voters also passed a referendum this November calling for a $10
minimum wage by 2015 with a 66% vote.
Opponents have criticized the action as devastating to small
businesses. Governor elect Bruce Rauner warned that the minimum wage
could make the city less competitive, and cause it to lose business
nearby communities and Indiana. The Illinois Restaurant Association,
Chicagoland Chamber of Commerce, and Illinois Hotel and Lodging Association
favored a lesser, statewide increase to allow for a level playing field.
Business owners testified that the increase will be devastating to their
businesses. They further testified that small and mid-sized businesses, already
feeling the impact of the Affordable Care Act, will be forced to lay off more
employees. Additionally, the increase will lead to higher demand for City
of Chicago jobs, which may lead to even higher unemployment.
The new ordinance will have vast legal implications for
Illinois businesses. To discuss the impact the ordinance has on your
business, please contact your attorney at Clark Hill PLC.
The entire Ordinance can be found here:
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)